The term “distressed asset” carries connotations of failure, risk, and complexity. In the South African market, it should also carry connotations of opportunity, but only for buyers who understand exactly what they are acquiring, under which legal framework, and at what stage of financial difficulty the target company sits.
I want to be precise about this, because imprecision in this space is dangerous. There is a meaningful difference between a company in early financial distress, a company under formal business rescue proceedings in terms of Chapter 6 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008, and a company that has proceeded to liquidation under the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936. Each carries a different risk profile, acquisition pathway, and set of legal obligations. Treating them as interchangeable is the most common mistake I see from investors entering this space for the first time.
The Legal Landscape: Chapter 6 and What It Actually Means
South Africa’s business rescue framework, introduced under Chapter 6 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008, was designed to give financially distressed companies a supervised opportunity to restructure rather than proceed directly to liquidation. A company may commence voluntary business rescue proceedings under Section 129, subject to a resolution by the board and filing with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC).
Alternatively, a court may order commencement of business rescue under Section 131, typically on application by an affected person.
A Business Rescue Practitioner (BRP) is appointed a licensed professional registered with the CIPC who takes effective control of the company and develops a business rescue plan. That plan must be adopted by the requisite majority of creditors and shareholders to proceed. If it fails, the company typically proceeds to liquidation.
Pre-rescue acquisitions acquiring a distressed company before formal proceedings commence are often the more attractive entry point. These require early identification of financially stressed businesses, direct negotiation with shareholders and creditors, and a structured transaction that addresses the debt burden, operational deficiencies, and regulatory compliance position simultaneously.
The Acquisition Process: Key Legal and Regulatory Considerations
Acquiring a distressed South African business is not simply a matter of agreeing a purchase price with a willing seller. There are several regulatory dimensions that must be navigated correctly:
Competition Commission approval: Any transaction that meets the threshold for a notifiable merger under the Competition Act 89 of 1998 must be approved before implementation. Intermediate mergers currently defined with reference to combined annual turnover or assets require approval from the Competition Commission, which carries both timeline and uncertainty implications. A distressed acquisition structured as an asset purchase rather than a share purchase may affect the merger notification analysis and should be assessed by competition counsel at the outset.
BBBEE compliance: A change of ownership in a South African operating business triggers reassessment of the target’s BBBEE compliance status under the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act 53 of 2003 and the applicable sector codes. For healthcare businesses, the Health Sector Code applies. An acquisition that inadvertently reduces the target’s BBBEE ownership level can affect its ability to contract with government, public entities, and certain private sector counterparties. This is not a post-closing consideration, it must be structured into the transaction from the outset.
Creditor treatment and the payment waterfall: In a business rescue context, the BRP’s approved plan will determine the treatment of concurrent, secured, and statutory preferential creditors including SARS, employees under the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, and secured lenders. An acquirer participating in a business rescue plan must understand precisely where their capital sits in the payment waterfall and what obligations they assume on conclusion of the plan.
Tax and structuring: Debt waiver arrangements common in distressed restructurings have specific income tax implications under Section 19 and Paragraph 12A of the Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962. The tax treatment of debt forgiveness, asset impairments, and capital gains arising from the transaction must be carefully analysed. SARS maintains a specific position on debt relief arrangements that are part of a commercial restructuring, and tax advice is non-negotiable in any meaningful distressed acquisition.
Valuation in a Distressed Context: What Discipline Requires
Valuing a distressed SA business requires a different analytical framework than valuing a going concern. Earnings-based multiples EV/EBITDA, price-to-earnings are of limited utility when EBITDA is negative or artificially depressed by the distress itself. The more relevant frameworks are:
Net asset value with impairment analysis: What are the realisable values of the underlying assets – property, equipment, book debts, intellectual property, licences – after realistic impairments? This establishes the floor.
Normalised earnings potential: What would the business earn under competent management, with the debt burden restructured and the operational deficiencies addressed? This establishes the ceiling. The acquisition thesis lives in the gap between floor and ceiling.
Comparable transaction evidence: SA-specific transaction multiples for healthcare and services businesses where available through CIPC records, published deal announcements, and sector research provide a market calibration that purely theoretical models cannot.
The Governance Imperative Post-Acquisition
King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa provides the applicable governance framework for any company operating in this market, whether listed or unlisted. In a post-acquisition context, the practical governance priorities are clear: reconstitute the board with appropriate independence and competence; establish functioning audit and risk committees; implement reliable management reporting; and address any regulatory compliance arrears with SARS, the CIPC, and applicable sector regulators as a matter of urgency.
Governance failure is the most common reason that technically viable distressed businesses fail to recover under new ownership. The operational turnaround and the governance reconstruction must proceed simultaneously, not sequentially.
The Current Window and Why Timing Is a Real Variable
The South African Reserve Bank’s current monetary policy easing cycle is a genuine tailwind for distressed acquisition activity. Reduced prime lending
rates lower the carrying cost of debt-funded acquisitions and reduce the financial pressure on over-leveraged targets extending the runway for recovery. Simultaneously, the prolonged period of above-average interest rates between 2022 and 2024 has produced a cohort of operationally viable businesses that accumulated debt at a rate their revenues could not service. That cohort is a defined, identifiable market.
The window created by this dynamic will not remain open indefinitely. As macro conditions improve, distressed sellers will recover options refinancing becomes available, trade buyers re-enter, and acquisition discounts narrow. The investor who understands the legal, regulatory, and operational framework today is positioned to act during the window, not after it.
What This Requires of the Acquirer
I want to be direct about this, because the distressed acquisition opportunity in South Africa is real but it is not passive. It requires sector expertise sufficient to assess operational recovery potential; legal and regulatory knowledge to navigate Chapter 6, Competition Commission processes, BBBEE restructuring, and tax implications; governance capability to reconstitute the target’s leadership and oversight structures post-acquisition; and patient capital typically a 4–6 year horizon with realistic expectations about liquidity.
The buyers who have generated consistent returns in this space in South Africa are not financial engineers. They are operators who understand their sectors deeply enough to see what a distressed business could become and who have the capability to close the gap between what it is and what it could be.
Gerhardus (Gert) Viljoen is CEO of V Professional Services, founder and former CEO of UHS PLC (listed on the London Stock Exchange), and a specialist in distressed asset acquisition, healthcare finance, and corporate governance. He completed a BCom Financial and Accounting Honours, CTA and CPA, is also a member of the Institute of Directors South
Africa and the South African Institute of Professional Accountants.
Follow for weekly commentary on South African corporate finance, distressed asset strategy, and governance.